PRIVACY-FIRST PLANNING WORKSPACE FIXTURE DEMO

See what could make school journeys work better.

A clear evidence pack for councils and school trusts: compare travel options from approximate areas, identify friction, and decide which small intervention deserves a closer look.

Explore a journey
No child data required

Uses an approximate origin area and public evidence. No names, addresses, tracking or pupil profiles.

02 / JOURNEY EVIDENCE

Northfield N3 → Oakfield Community Primary

School-day arrival · Tue 15 Sep 2026 · 08:35 target

Overall medium confidence
A
ORIGIN AREANorthfield N3 sector
B
SCHOOLOakfield Primary
Screening result, not a safe-route verdict

Recorded collision data is incomplete and conditions change. An adult, school or council must verify any proposed route on the ground.

Higher confidence Some verification needed Limited or modelled evidence
03 / SCHOOL & AREA CONTEXT

What sits behind the journey?

Every signal keeps its source, date and caveat.

04 / REVIEW WORKFLOW

Turn friction into a next step.

Use the queue to record what needs local confirmation before a school-street, crossing, walking-bus or bus-stop proposal is discussed.

3items for local review
Evidence pack draft
METHOD & LIMITS

Evidence should make decisions clearer, not pretend to make them for you.

PRIVACY BY DEFAULT

Designed without child data.

This prototype takes a school and a coarse origin area. It does not ask for a pupil name, full address, attendance, live location, route history or accessibility inference.

METHODOLOGY

How to read this screen.

Each card is a small evidence snapshot, not a ranking. The planning signal combines route facts and source health to suggest where adult review may be useful.

High confidence

Recent, directly measured or officially maintained evidence.

Medium confidence

Useful evidence with age, coverage or geometry limitations.

Low confidence

Modelled, incomplete or awaiting local confirmation.